The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped. Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, and also clarified some points on April 17, , but till date the state had not granted sanction. The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.

Author:Kajisar Majind
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):16 September 2009
PDF File Size:16.19 Mb
ePub File Size:6.63 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Web Archive January 29, pm. The CBI charge-sheet, according to Dr Mishra, rubbished the "theory" floated by the Trinamul Congress that the police had resorted to firing at the behest of Mr Bhattacharjee. The firing was the culmination of a series of disruptive activities organised by the sponsors of the agitation who dug up roads and blew up bridges, while a police officer Sadhucharan Chatterjee was killed.

The Maoists also joined the agitation. Of the persons alleged to have been killed in police firing, several had marks of injuries from sharp weapons, according to the charge sheet. Moreover, the charge sheet mentioned that reports of people going missing from the area after the incident and women and children tortured were unfounded, Dr Mishra claimed. A police contingent, sent to oversee the repair of a broken bridge at Bhangaberia appealed over microphone to the mob, which had gathered there, to maintain peace.

But when the men in uniform were attacked, it burst tear gas shells and then opened fire following the order of an executive magistrate accompanying the police team. Incidentally, the executive magistrate who had ordered the firing is now the private secretary of a minister who is close to chief minister Mamata Banerjee, the Leader of the Opposition pointed out. Moreover, the new government did not let the CBI prosecute six police officers in connection with the incident, Dr Mishra said.

These officers are now holding key posts which show they are reliable functionaries of this regime, he said. The Trinamul MP from Tamluk said the CBI charge sheet was a "carbon copy" of the report filed by then officer-in-charge of Nandigram police station which justified the firing.

TAGS :. Related Latest News. Bihar courts devise unique way to fight deadly coronavirus. Sulking Sidhu eyeing new inning with AAP? Himachal to constitute 6th State Finance Commission.


CBI chargesheets reopen debate on Nandigram, Left claims its stand vindicated

Last year, Sukumar Jana and others filed a writ petition in the Calcutta High Court claiming that despite a lapse of six years, they were yet to know about the outcome of the CBI probe. As the came up for hearing Thursday, they challenged the CBI chargesheet filed in the criminal court. They requested the Bench to set up a Special Investigation Team to probe into the case. It may be mentioned that the state government has already written several letters to the CBI asking why top level police officers, who led the operation in Nandigram, were not named in the chargesheet.

AWE 6516 PDF

Foul play behind selective leak of CBI report on Nandigram: CPM

This story is from January 30, It contradicts the Calcutta high court's order of that called the firing "unconstitutional" in a major embarrassment to the Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee government. Fourteen villagers were shot dead on March 14, Two days later, the high court said the police firing was "wholly unconstitutional and cannot be justified under any provision of the law" and asked CBI to investigate it. However, the CBI chargesheet, submitted to additional chief judicial magistrate Haldia on December 18, , says: "It has been established that the assembly was an unlawful assembly as declared by the executive magistrate and they obstructed public servant in performing legal duty.

Related Articles